Saturday, January 31, 2009

Greeks and the zen of drinking

This being a long and dry weekend for me, I thought this was an apt article to discuss from the NY Times on this long and boring Saturday morning at work…

The Tipsy Hero
By
Alexander Nazaryan

A student in one of my English classes recently asked about the endless references to drinking wine in “The Odyssey.” The question, which had nothing to do with my lesson, was a good one. Wine has a constant presence in the epic poem, whose most famous image is probably Homer’s evocation of the “wine-dark sea” that Odysseus sails in search of his native Ithaka. Sometimes it is mere tonic on an impossibly long journey home from the Trojan War, but on occasion wine is more powerful than the sword, as when Odysseus escapes from the Cyclops by getting him drunk. Homer may have been blind, but his taste buds were to wine, and he reserved his richest adjectives for it: heady, mellow, ruddy, shining, glowing, seasoned, hearty, honeyed, glistening, heart-warming, and, of course, irresistible. (Ok, great…Greeks love to drink. Tis a point well understood if you have ever met a swarthy diner-owner whom is more attached to his tumbler of ouzo than I am to my day-long mug of coffee).

How to wreck a symposium: have one too many bowls of wine and hit on Socrates. (Even worse hit on Plato)

Much of “The Odyssey,” with its endless feasting and fighting, reads like a James Bond escapade with wine bowls instead of martini glasses (Uhhh…if you like your Bond to be 5’6’’ with hairy shoulders), but in the classroom lessons on heroic archetypes and dactylic hexameter prevail. After all, it is unlikely that any standardized test will ask about the intricate drinking rituals that permeated the culture of ancient Greece (Intricate? Pour. Drink. Break Glass. Repeat). But the breathtaking wine kraters in the Metropolitan Museum of Art (Drink), the dialogues of Plato (Drink and hit on men), the plays of Euripides (Drink, hit on men, screw your mother) , all attest to a longstanding relationship with alcohol (And an interesting one it is).

The Greeks taught us plenty about philosophy, government and art (We did? Where are my royalties?). And we can learn from their drinking, too. They loved wine, yet knew that its consumption must be carefully controlled (Dionysus was not a huge advocate of moderation, BTW it was said that he went to the East to learn of drinking...I wonder where he went? Katsu!) . The fermented grape was an exalted, mysterious object: the notion of “needing” to get drunk, of using alcohol to deaden the difficulties of being alive, would have seemed like the perversion of a passion enjoyed by gods and mortals alike.

Don’t get me wrong: I don’t spend my free time offering libations to Dionysus (Why not? I do.), but I admire how open the Greeks were about to the role of alcohol in their society (unsurprising, perhaps, for a people whose highest ideal was “the examined lifeand a people whose water would kill you). In modern times, it seems we readily migrate to the extremes, either abusing alcohol or treating it as if it doesn’t exist, without acknowledging a healthy middle ground (Oh BS! They were just as bad, read some Roman bathroom graffiti “Drunk as a Greek” comes to mind). As a constant conduit between the realms of adulthood and innocence, I find this particularly troublesome because too many young adults will discover drinking in a rowdy fraternity or a bar that doesn’t care much about whom it serves (In Greece, if you can reach the bar then you can drink). Surely, there must be something for them between “Animal House” and the Anti-Saloon League (Yes, it is called SVP. Although much closer to the former than the latter).

It is unlikely that a modern-day Aristotle would ever find himself in the basement of Delta house playing beer pong (Plato would…Elephant Walk, anyone?) to the sounds of Lynyrd Skynyrd (We all know that Aristotle is a Metallica fan) (he might have also wondered why a house full of J. Crew-clad lacrosse players is called “Greek”). In “
Courtesans & Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens",describes the symposium, a “classic moderate drinking-party” common to the wealthier households of Athens, during which men of stature would engage in lively debate(debate? Drunk Greeks don't debate. They throw plates at you.) , with bowls of wine dispensed under the careful watch of a symposiarch (a sort of strict toastmaster, ie Plato). The most famous of these is described in Plato’s “Symposium,” where Socrates and his friends, still hung over from the previous night’s carousing, decide on an evening of light drinking (See? This is Greek moderation…“Hey Slavos, we drank like feral pigs last night. Hows ‘bout this morning we stick to just ouzo and water, eh?”). The temperance pays off: in the ensuing discussion, they summon an overarching vision of love (Damn that Plato) that has endured in the Western imagination for more than two millennia (Tell me about it…if I hear one more Greek navy joke…).


But amidst their philosophical euphoria, there is a strong note of warning about moderation: the handsome youth Alcibiades “arrives in a state of high intoxication,” Davidson writes. He drunkenly tries to cozy up to the older Socrates (DAMMIT!!!) , who has no patience for his prurient come-ons and intimations. Alcibiades is eventually subdued, but soon a group of boozy revelers bursts in. “There was noise everywhere, and everyone was made to start drinking in no particular order,” Plato dryly records (Uhuh….just recording right?). The drinking party comes to an unceremonious conclusion because love of drink overpowers love of truth.

Order had a counterpart in Greece, not merely in a disorganized happy-hour sort of debauchery, but a controlled ecstasy that allowed the Greeks to plumb the depths of intoxication without drowning in them (That’s right. I am NOT an alcoholic, I just “plumb” too much). Today “irrational exuberance” means bankruptcies and foreclosures; for the Greeks, a measure of irrationality checked the rule of reason. When the world – remarkably similar to our own in its stresses and struggles – intruded too much on their inner selves, the Greeks sought refuge in what the classical scholar E.R. Dodds calls, in his seminal (NEVER use that word when talking about Greeks)
The Greeks and the Irrational,” the “less conscious level of human experience.” Wine provided that respite from rational thought, especiallyduring the festivals for Dionysus that eventually gave rise to theatrical performance (Those first few had to have been hilarious “Hey NICK, who plays the donkey in this one?”). “Dionysus offered freedom,” Dodds writes. “He was essentially a god of joy,” unlike the more reserved champion of reason Apollo (Apollo was god of douche) . But the Greeks also understood that it was easy for the seductive ecstasy of drink to degenerate into ugly abuse. The playwright Euripides, in his “Bacchae,” describes a group of women who, under the spell of Dionysus, murder King Pentheus of Thebes by tearing apart his limbs (Oh, by the way. Greeks HATE women. Misogynistic as hell). The dark side of consuming “fountains of wine” is on gruesome display.

None of this made it into my classroom. Maybe I was too frightened to tackle such a mature subject with such a young crowd (Pansy); or maybe the English teacher’s customary obsession with covering every grammatical concept and literary term simply drove me to more practical shores (Boring). But my student’s question did engender a lively, if brief, conversation. Someone thought that it was unseemly for a hero to drink (Fail that dipshit), while others figured that with his sights set on home, Odysseus didn’t have much time to nurse a hangover (Ok…for practical purposes, sailors ONLY drink booze while out to sea. Watch a movie). There would be no time for wine to flow, they argued (There is always time for that).

I wasn’t quite satisfied, and the question continued to bother me until, days later, I found a passage in “The Odyssey” that succinctly captures the complexity of the Greek attitude towards alcohol. Odysseus is speaking to a sympathetic swineherd (ahh…the lowly swineherd. I come from a long line of swineherds) , and though he is in disguise, the words have the unmistakable ring of honesty:

[I]t is the wine that leads me on, the wild wine that sets the wisest
man to sing at the top of his lungs,laugh like a fool – it drives the man to
dancing (not me)…it even tempts him to blurt out stories better
never told (well hell, I do that sober).

After two decades away from home, there must have been so much to say, so many bottled-up tales of friends lost and battles won. Somebody get the poor guy another round (I need a drink).

Well that was fun. I think I need to reread "Zorba the Greek" and drink some absinthe next weekend.

Cheers!

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

John Updike Dead at 76

Not a huge fan of his writings. I know..."How dare I" but I loved this quote taken from the AP article reporting his death.

Born in Reading, Pa., raised in the Protestant community of Shillington, Pa., where the Lord's Prayer was recited daily at school, Updike was a lifelong churchgoer influenced by his faith, but not immune to doubts.

"I remember the times when I was wrestling with these issues that I would feel crushed. I was crushed by the purely materialistic, atheistic account of the universe," Updike told The Associated Press during a 2006 interview.

"I am very prone to accept all that the scientists tell us," he said. "But I can't quite make the leap of unfaith, as it were, and say, `This is it. Carpe diem (seize the day), and tough luck.'"

I really like the fact that he was a freethinking, religious man. This is very rare. Usually you are piled into either one of two camps: Those that accept faith and reject science and rationalism or those that are supreme rationalist who refuse and belittle faith.

In this way I think that I am in complete agreement with Mr. Updike.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Ohhh....sad day


Ricardo Montalban died yesterday at the age of 88. I don't have much to say about this other than Khan used to scare the crap out of me as a kid. I remember doing the Capt. Kirk scream at him when ever I watched the movie *shakes fist*..."Khaaaaaaann!"

Oh good stuff. Also the man had a voice that is second only to James Earl Jones in pure coolness. I have the habit of when bored while reading something, I will begin to read like Khan. So much more exciting. Anyway, I hope that if anyone reads this they will read it sounding like Ricardo. It will make this sound much more interesting.

Cheers,

ps. If I have a chest like Ricardo does in Star Trek II when I am his age, I will be a very happy man.

Friday, January 9, 2009

Alfred Russel Wallace: Darwin's Little Brother

I love this time of year. It is like my Christmas and Easter rolled into a big burrito of spicy science goodness. This and next month hold the birthdays of both Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace. Good stuff and the media is actually grasping hold of it (somewhat) and running with it. Amazingly, the library is actually out of all Darwin related books (and NOT the creationist ones). However, nothing is out on Wallace (and granted, we don't have that much, but still).

Just a few things to think about though. Both were great scientists and suffered much for their art (good science is indeed an art) but while Darwin was largely...well...rich and had land and leisure. And, damnit, he took the leisure seriously and put it to some good use. If Darwin was a great cerebralist then Wallace thought and worked with his heart.

My boy Wallace, he was a middle son from a middle class (if that) family and had to work hard for prominance and work he did. He worked as a surveyor, civil engineer and lecturer all before his early twenties. He hoped to make his fortune in the Amazon by collecting unknown species and then selling the collections to a museum. Thus providing him with income and a bed of research materials to last his career. Hard years of collecting and disease led him to quite an array of specimens that, unfortunately, were later lost when his ship caught on fire on the way back to merry-old-England.

Living off of some publications and lectures from his travels (I believe he even published a travel book, these being very popular at the time), Wallace continued to plan for the future. He headed to the Malay Archipelago on a mission similar to the in the Amazon. Especially looking for Birds of Paradise. During these explorations he refined his thoughts about evolution and wrote on of his seminal works -"The Malay Archipelago" which extremely popular and went through several printings.

This is where things turned on poor Wallace. Unable to aquire a museum or academic post, Wallace was forced to write articles and grade examinations to make a living. While this seems pretty standard for most scientists now, the time period tendedto lend itself to "gentleman and gentlewomen" naturalists. Even lobbying from Darwin couldn't get him a post but he did, after much work, get him supplied with a government pension for all of his previous service to state.

To shorten this up...Wallace began pissing people off. Why? Well, he got into some social issues. Mostly women's sufferage and peace movements. This plus a healthy delving into spiritualism caused his eventual fall from scientific and societal grace. Very unfortunate.

Either way, at his death, the New York Times reported that Wallace was one of "the last of the giants belonging to that wonderful group of intellectuals that included, among others, Darwin, Huxley, Spencer, Lyell, and Owen, whose daring investigations revolutionized and evolutionized the thought of the century".

So. Cheers, Alfred! We love you, you crazy, progressive, hard-nosed, sonofabitch and happy goddamned birthday!

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Zen and the art of role-playing

Ok, Bev and baby got in fine...at 11:30 New Years Eve.

I found this blog and I think I love it. Perfect for the closet geek in all of us. Being a role-player through out Middle and High School, I can appreciate this fella's passion. I don't play any more, mind you. Not because I graduated from my geekdom but pretty much because I couldn't find the time if I tried.

Either way here it is...geeks rejoice!

http://arsludi.lamemage.com/

If you are curious I was a HUGE fan of Ravenloft and the Dragonlance modules.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Nordic rites and Pizza


I was always confused by the term "pagan". It originally comes from the latin "paganus" meaning rustic or country dweller. By common, popular connotation it refers to an animalist, polytheistic, nature-based, usually regionalized form of worship. Sometimes confused with the Wicca religion (which may or may not be considered pagan since it has only one, i think, deity).


Am I a pagan and, if so, should I worry about this...should I even care?


Common Christian usage of the term infers that it encompasses everything that is NOT Christian, including Judaism and Islam as well as Hinduism, Buddhism and any of the numurous nature-based, shaminstic traditions around the world. In that case, maybe I should enjoy being a pagan and embrase the title along with my own little inner-heathen. I picture it looking somewhat like the hedgehog (i think it was called the Grumblehog) in Jim Henson's The Storyteller. All prickly and gruff and pointy.


Just a quick side note...Jim Henson was a genius. His stuff lives on, not as well as it did before, but still lives on. http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Muppet_Wiki


Most of this is stemming off from the Asatru (Norse Neopaganism) vigil I attended last night. And just what IS neo-paganism? It consisted of mostly drinking, games, stories, jokes, lighting candles and a few stories. Were I not flying out to the East Coast today, I would have preferred to stay through the entire thing. Some interesting parallels to my own faith (Buddhism). Darrin poured part of the food and drink as offerings to ancestors and the gods. Buddhists do the same thing in the form of rice or burning incense, Hindus use milk sometimes.

Appeasements to angry or disembodied spirits through the sprinkling of mead (which was homemade by Matt for a year and was very tasty). Buddhists wish to appease hungry ghost in the same way. Hungry ghosts being, in Buddhist terms, a samsaric reincarnation of either men or gods who have fallen to attachments (such as greed or lust).

Incidentally, several sodas exploded in my car last night. Perhaps I should have drank less mead and sprinkled more of it around. All the Thor jokes probably didn't help either.

This whole thing has sort of made me want to do my own vigil for the New Years celebration this year but without the typical ball dropping and cheers to all. I will have the house to myself since Bev and Eliza will still be away in Jersey. So I am thinking maybe a large bonfire in the backyard, some incense, some kinhin followed by some homemade saki and chanting.

Sounds good to me...and if the Norse Parthenon wishes to show up as well, then great but this time, No Feats of Strenth. The Hindus and Wiccans are invited as well but my yard is sort of small and they tend to pack the house what with all the devas and devis and sprites and gnomes.

Friday, December 12, 2008

An Intro to Blogging

Only because time is limited, I will limit myself to describing the title of this blog. "Sweep the dust, push the dirt" was a quote from a Buddha story I heard a few years back (while I attended school in New Jersey) concerning a group of monks and the Buddha.

The two older monks were very skilled in the Dharma and well on their way up the enlightened path and conferred with the Buddha concerning how they could finally attain enlightenment. While I don't recall exactly what the nature of the advise was, I do recall that eventually one of the older monks commented on one of their younger brethren who was, basically, dumb. Not very quick on the uptake and all the other monks could think of having him do was sweep.

Now, while all this was going on the sweeping monk was listening, probably hoping to pick up asome piece of knowledge from the conversation going on that would aid in his spirititual quest. However, not being very smart, he could not follow most of it, but was very aware of the fact that attention was suddenly upon him and his eavesdropping.

The Buddha came over and talked with the younger monk for a while and when asked for advise, he simply stated "Sweep the Dust, Push the Dirt". The monk took the advise and continued with his assigned task and soon attained enlightenment. Well before any of his more intelligent and witty fellow monks.

So...I assume the story has something to do with mindfullness and the attention that has to be paid to a task (very Zen, this viewpoint is...). The other is that Skillfull Means will vary from person to person dependant upon their own abilities and that enlightenment will depend mostly upon what an individual can do.

Anyway, I got a "D" in my Buddhism class. So, who knows what this story means but I like it and if anyone is able to pinpoint from whence it came, I would apreciate it.

Cheers,

]_/\_[